Re: [PATCH v2 00/10] pwm: add support for atomic update

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Mark,

On Mon, 20 Jul 2015 18:19:50 +0100
Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 05:31:57PM +0200, Boris Brezillon wrote:
> 
> > - dropped pwm-regulator patches (should be submitted separately)
> 
> I think the second patch needs to go in with this series doesn't it?  It
> was just the enable one that was good to go immediately IIRC.

I was planning on submitting those two patches after the PWM changes
have been merged, but you're right, maybe we should think about a proper
way to smoothly get all of them in the same release.

I have rebased my work on top your regulator/topic/pwm branch containing
Lee's work [1].

Note that patch 1 has changed a bit to take Lee's additions into
account.

Thierry, could you create a branch based on Mark's regulator/topic/pwm
branch ?
If everybody agrees on the solution I'll send a v3 rebasing my work on
top of this topic branch.

Best Regards,

Boris

[1]https://github.com/bbrezillon/linux-rk/tree/atomic-pwm-v3
-- 
Boris Brezillon, Free Electrons
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
http://free-electrons.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html



[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux