Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] leds: blink resolution improvements

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> >>- You will set the delay in ms units. For example for 100us you'll
> >>write 0.1. IMHO it is counter-intuitive: people will make a mistake
> >>and try 0.0001 instead, wrongly assuming that this is in seconds.
> >>And nanoseconds should then better be removed, as writing
> >>nanosecond delay will just require too much zeros.
> >This is machine-to-machine interface. And users can handle this.
> OK. I think you mostly convinced me that this solution is not
> that bad. :) But I am going to add an explicit "Acked-by" then,
> to emphasize that it is your idea and not mine.

Feel free to note that it is my idea, but I'd have to see&like the
patch before you can add Acked-by.

Thanks,
									Pavel
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux