Re: [PATCH] leds: gpio: Fix device teardown on probe deferral

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 2:11 AM, Jacek Anaszewski
<j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
>
> On 04/14/2015 11:23 PM, Sebastian Hesselbarth wrote:
>>
>> In gpio_leds_create(), when devm_get_gpiod_from_child() fails with
>> -EPROBE_DEFER on the second gpio led to be created, the first already
>> registered led is not torn down properly. This causes create_gpio_led()
>> to fail for the first led on re-probe().
>>
>> Fix this misbehaviour by incrementing num_leds only if all
>> potentially failing calls completed successfully.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Sebastian Hesselbarth <sebastian.hesselbarth@xxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Cc: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Richard Purdie <rpurdie@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: linux-leds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> ---
>>   drivers/leds/leds-gpio.c | 5 +++--
>>   1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
>
> For this patch:
>
> Acked-by: Jacek Anaszewski <j.anaszewski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>

Thanks, I merged it.
-Bryan

> I have a question regarding the sequence above on line 201:
>
> if (!led.name)
>         return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
>
> Shouldn't this be also 'goto err"?
>
> --
> Best Regards,
> Jacek Anaszewski
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html




[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux