Hi! > > Now, this is untested patch from my reverse-engineering. I hope I > > understood things right... > > > > In particular, there's unbalanced unlock in > > lp5523_update_program_memory, and lp5523_update_program_memory needs > > to be protected by the lock. > > > > Comments? Does someone maintain this? > > > > Actually the locking issue was fixed in my for-next branch, > http://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/cooloney/linux-leds.git/commit/?h=for-next&id=0d70bdb957cde2c25a4b3e4c93d0d33403795be9 > Yes, that should solve it. Thanks! Pavel -- (english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek (cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html