Re: [PATCH] leds: wm8350: Complain if we fail to reenable DCDC

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 11:40 PM, Mark Brown
<broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Provide some trace, though the hardware is most likely non-functional if
> this happens.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  drivers/leds/leds-wm8350.c |    6 +++++-
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/leds/leds-wm8350.c b/drivers/leds/leds-wm8350.c
> index ed15157..86bdab3 100644
> --- a/drivers/leds/leds-wm8350.c
> +++ b/drivers/leds/leds-wm8350.c
> @@ -129,7 +129,11 @@ static void wm8350_led_disable(struct wm8350_led *led)
>         ret = regulator_disable(led->isink);
>         if (ret != 0) {
>                 dev_err(led->cdev.dev, "Failed to disable ISINK: %d\n", ret);
> -               regulator_enable(led->dcdc);
> +               ret = regulator_enable(led->dcdc);
> +               if (ret != 0) {
looks like we don't need this bracket here.

> +                       dev_err(led->cdev.dev, "Failed to reenable DCDC: %d\n",
> +                               ret);
> +               }
ditto.

Thanks,
-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux