On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 11:44:22AM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote: > Hi Bryan, Richard, > > >On 01/30/2013 09:17 AM, Thierry Reding wrote: > >>On Mon, Jan 28, 2013 at 03:00:59PM +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote: > >>>Call to led_pwm_set() can happen inside atomic context, like triggers. > >>>If the PWM call can sleep, defer using a worker. > >>> > >>>Cc: Peter Ujfalusi <peter.ujfalusi@xxxxxx> > >>>Signed-off-by: Florian Vaussard <florian.vaussard@xxxxxxx> > >>>--- > >>> drivers/leds/leds-pwm.c | 50 > >>>+++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++------- > >>> 1 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-) > >> > >>Bryan, I assume that you'll be taking this? It doesn't apply cleanly to > >>my tree, probably because of Peter's recent changes that you took > >>through your tree and Florian based his patches on top of that. The > >>conflict resolution should be trivial, though. > >> > > > >It seems that this patch was not taken. Could you pull it, as the other > >part is already in linux-pwm? Or is there any show stopper? > > > > Ping? Who should merge this? I assume Bryan will take it through the LED tree? Patches 1 & 2 went into v3.9-rc1 through the PWM tree. Thierry
Attachment:
pgpK_zTcBC11w.pgp
Description: PGP signature
