On 11/07/2012 01:55 PM, Marek Belisko wrote: > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/tca6507.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/leds/tca6507.txt > +LEDs conected to tca6507 > + > +Required properties: > +- compatible : should be : "leds-tca6507". "ti,tca6507" would be more typical. > +Each led is represented as a sub-node of the leds-tca6507 device. > + > +LED sub-node properties: > +- label : label for this LED > +- reg : number of LED line (could be from 0 to 6) > +- linux,default-trigger : led default trigger You probably want to mention which binding document defines the valid values for that property; ../gpio/led.txt I think. I wonder if we need to think about representing the blinking/fading/... capabilities of the chip too? Should that be encoded into the DT, or should it be controlled at run-time via some LED subsystem? -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
