Re: [PATCH] ledtrig-cpu: use spin_lock to replace mutex lock

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 11:35 AM, Linus Walleij
<linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 8:18 PM, Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Mutex lock is not safe in atomic context like the bug reported by
>> Miles Lane:
> (...)
>> This patch replace mutex lock with spin lock which is safe for this case.
>>
>> Reported-by: Miles Lane <miles.lane@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Reported-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rjw@xxxxxxx>
>> Cc: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> Signed-off-by: Bryan Wu <cooloney@xxxxxxxxx>
>
> Looks correct to me:
> Acked-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@xxxxxxxxxx>
>

Thanks, Linus.

Miles, could you please help to try this patch on your testing system?
I really appreciate it.

-Bryan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux