Re: [PATCH v2] leds: leds-gpio: adopt pinctrl support

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Tony,

> * Marek Vasut <marex@xxxxxxx> [120904 20:13]:
> > Dear Bryan Wu,
> > 
> > > On Sat, Sep 1, 2012 at 4:16 PM, AnilKumar Ch <anilkumar@xxxxxx> wrote:
> > > > Adopt pinctrl support to leds-gpio driver based on leds-gpio
> > > > device pointer, pinctrl driver configure SoC pins to GPIO
> > > > mode according to definitions provided in .dts file.
> > > 
> > > Thanks for this, actually Marek Vasut submitted a similar patch
> > > before. I'm pretty fine with this patch.
> > 
> > Thanks for submitting this actually ... I didn't have time to properly
> > investigate this.
> > 
> > > But without proper DT setting, it will also give us warning I think.
> > > or we can provide some dummy functions as a temp solution as Shawn
> > > pointed out before.
> > 
> > But this driver is also used on hardware that's not yet coverted to DT,
> > so I'd say dev_warn() if CONFIG_OF is enabled and otherwise simply go on
> > ? Actually, can we not skip whole this pinctrl thing if CONFIG_OF is
> > disabled? Actually (2), what's the relationship between OF and pinctrl?
> 
> The warning should be pinctrl related as the pinctrl drivers may not be
> device tree based drivers.

Exactly my concern. Also the warning shouldnt be present on systems where 
pinctrl is disabled.

> Regards,
> 
> Tony

Best regards,
Marek Vasut
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-leds" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html


[Index of Archives]     [Linux ARM Kernel]     [Linux ARM]     [Linux Omap]     [Fedora ARM]     [IETF Annouce]     [Security]     [Bugtraq]     [Linux OMAP]     [Linux MIPS]     [ECOS]     [Asterisk Internet PBX]     [Linux API]

  Powered by Linux