Re: [PATCH] rseq/selftests: ensure the rseq abi TLS is actually 1024 bytes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Mar 11, 2025 at 03:21:45PM -0400, Michael Jeanson wrote:

> Adding the aligned(1024) attribute to the definition of __rseq_abi did
> not increase its size to 1024, for this attribute to impact the size of
> __rseq_abi it would need to be added to the declaration of 'struct
> rseq_abi'. We only want to increase the size of the TLS allocation to
> ensure registration will succeed with future extended ABI. Use a union
> with a dummy member to ensure we allocate 1024 bytes.

This is in today's -next and breaks the build of the KVM selftests:

In file included from rseq_test.c:24:
/home/broonie/git/bisect/usr/include/linux/rseq.h:62:1: error: use of 'rseq' with tag type that does not match previous declaration
   62 | struct rseq {
      | ^
./../rseq/rseq.c:78:7: note: previous use is here
   78 | union rseq {
      |       ^
In file included from rseq_test.c:24:
/home/broonie/git/bisect/usr/include/linux/rseq.h:62:8: error: redefinition of 'rseq'
   62 | struct rseq {
      |        ^
./../rseq/rseq.c:78:7: note: previous definition is here
   78 | union rseq {
      |       ^

since unlike the rseq tests the KVM rseq test includes the UAPI header
for rseq which the padded union conflicts with.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux