Please see below. > On Tue, Mar 18, 2025 at 1:27 AM <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > From: Chia-Yu Chang <chia-yu.chang@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > Hello, > > > > Plese find v2: > > > > v2 (18-03-2025) > > - Add one missing patch from previous AccECN protocol preparation patch series to this patch series > > > > The full patch series can be found in > > https://github.com/L4STeam/linux-net-next/commits/upstream_l4steam/ > > > > The Accurate ECN draft can be found in > > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-tcpm-accurate-ecn-28 > > > > Best regards, > > Chia-Yu > > > > Chia-Yu Chang (1): > > tcp: accecn: AccECN option failure handling > > > I do not see any tests, how can this be tested ? > > I am extremely worried. Thanks for the feedback. And I would do the packetdrill AccECN tests (https://github.com/minuscat/packetdrill_accecn/tree/main/gtests/net/tcp/accecn) to verify it. I've tested the latest net-next (6.14-rc6 commit 702e3fa16cd42ba712825e8d6171ea4755bc0491) with all 41 AccECN patches (11 patches are in net-next and 30 patches will be submitted series-by-series). All 189 cases are passed, does this look ok for you?
