On Wed Mar 12, 2025 at 7:01 PM CET, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> I think all the remaining comments are about strict provenance. I buy
> that this is a useful thing to do, but in the absence of automated
> tools to help do it, I'm not sure it's worth it to do it for just
> these things I happen to be touching rather than doing it throughout.
>
> I couldn't find a clippy lint. Do you know of one? If not, should we
> file an issue?
A quick search gave me:
https://doc.rust-lang.org/nightly/unstable-book/language-features/strict-provenance-lints.html
The linked tracking issue is closed which seems like a mistake, since
it's not yet stabilized. I found a different issue tracking it though:
https://github.com/rust-lang/rust/issues/130351
We probably should use both in that case:
#![feature(strict_provenance_lints)]
#![warn(fuzzy_provenance_casts, lossy_provenance_casts)]
I don't want to push more work onto this series, so it's fine to leave
them in. Thus:
Reviewed-by: Benno Lossin <benno.lossin@xxxxxxxxx>
We can either make this a good-first-issue, or if you also want to
tackle this, then go ahead :)
---
Cheers,
Benno
