On Thu, Mar 6, 2025 at 4:38 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed 2025-03-05 10:57:47, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:55 AM Andy Shevchenko > > <andriy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > > On Wed, Mar 05, 2025 at 10:25:51AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > > > On Wed, Mar 5, 2025 at 10:01 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Fri 2025-02-14 11:20:01, Tamir Duberstein wrote: > > > > > > ... > > > > > > > > > #include <kunit/test.h> > > > > > > -#include <linux/bitops.h> > > > > > > -#include <linux/kernel.h> > > > > > > #include <linux/module.h> > > > > > > -#include <linux/overflow.h> > > > > > > -#include <linux/printk.h> > > > > > > #include <linux/prandom.h> > > > > > > #include <linux/slab.h> > > > > > > -#include <linux/string.h> > > > > > > +#include <linux/sprintf.h> > > > > > > > > > > > > #define BUF_SIZE 1024 > > > > > > > > > > It would make more sense to do this clean up in the 3rd patch > > > > > where some code was replaced by the kunit macros. > > > > > > > > > > I would personally prefer to keep the explicit includes when the > > > > > related API is still used. It helps to optimize nested includes > > > > > in the header files which helps to speedup build. AFAIK, there > > > > > are people working in this optimization and they might need > > > > > to revert this change. > > > > > > > > Yeah, I don't feel strongly. I'll just restore all the includes. > > > > > > It will be blind approach. Please, try to look at them closely and include what > > > you use (IWYU principle). I don't think anybody uses kernel.h here, for > > > example. > > > > > I think I'm getting conflicting instructions here. IWYU is indeed what > > I did: bitops, kernel, overflow, printk are all unused; > > I believe that the headers were added for a reason. And this patchset > keeps most of the code. This is why the change look suspicious. > And I see in the patched lib/tests/scanf_kunit.c: > > + hweight32(), BITS_PER_TYPE(), BITS_PER_LONG which looks like bitops stuff > + is_signed_type(), type_min(), type_max() from overflow.h > > So, I would keep bitops.h and overflow.h. Thanks for checking. > The printk() calls were obviously removed in the 3rd patch so printk.h > include should be removed there. > > I do not see any obvious reason for kernel.h, so I would remove it > in a separate patch. > > > string is used only for sprintf, so I made that replacement. > > Makes sense. But please do this in a separate patch with this > explanation. It might be done together with the kernel.h removal. Will do. Thanks again. Tamir
