Re: [PATCH 0/2] kselftest/arm64: mte: Minor fixes to the MTE hugetlb test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 09:33:29 +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The first patch makes use of the correct terminology for synchronous and
> asynchronous errors. The second patch checks whether PROT_MTE is
> supported on hugetlb mappings before continuing with the tests. Such
> support was added in 6.13 but people tend to use current kselftests on
> older kernels. Avoid the failure reporting on such kernels, just skip
> the tests.
> 
> [...]

Applied to arm64 (for-next/kselftest), thanks!

[1/2] kselftest/arm64: mte: Use the correct naming for tag check modes in check_hugetlb_options.c
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/7ae95109c64d
[2/2] kselftest/arm64: mte: Skip the hugetlb tests if MTE not supported on such mappings
      https://git.kernel.org/arm64/c/306219d59b72

-- 
Catalin





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux