Re: [PATCH bpf-next v1 3/3] selftests/bpf: Fixes for test_maps test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi,

On 2/27/2025 10:26 PM, Jiayuan Chen wrote:
> BPF CI has failed 3 times in the last 24 hours. Add retry for ENOMEM.
> It's similar to the optimization plan:
> commit 2f553b032cad ("selftsets/bpf: Retry map update for non-preallocated per-cpu map")
>
> Failed CI:
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/13549227497/job/37868926343
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/13548089029/job/37865812030
> https://github.com/kernel-patches/bpf/actions/runs/13553536268/job/37883329296

Er, it is suspicious that the allocation of htab_elem failed, because
the size of key and value is small in these cases. It usually means that
there is something wrong with bpf mem allocator or the slub, therefore,
I think it is a bad idea to retry for ENOMEM in this case. Will try to
reproduce the problem first when get some time.
>
> selftests/bpf: Fixes for test_maps test
> Fork 100 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> Fork 100 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> Fork 100 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> Fork 100 tasks to 'test_update_delete'
> ......
> test_task_storage_map_stress_lookup:PASS
> test_maps: OK, 0 SKIPPED
>
> Signed-off-by: Jiayuan Chen <jiayuan.chen@xxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c | 9 +++++----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> index 8b40e9496af1..986ce32b113a 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_maps.c
> @@ -1396,9 +1396,10 @@ static void test_map_stress(void)
>  #define MAX_DELAY_US 50000
>  #define MIN_DELAY_RANGE_US 5000
>  
> -static bool retry_for_again_or_busy(int err)
> +static bool can_retry(int err)
>  {
> -	return (err == EAGAIN || err == EBUSY);
> +	return (err == EAGAIN || err == EBUSY ||
> +		(err == ENOMEM && map_opts.map_flags == BPF_F_NO_PREALLOC));
>  }
>  
>  int map_update_retriable(int map_fd, const void *key, const void *value, int flags, int attempts,
> @@ -1451,12 +1452,12 @@ static void test_update_delete(unsigned int fn, void *data)
>  
>  		if (do_update) {
>  			err = map_update_retriable(fd, &key, &value, BPF_NOEXIST, MAP_RETRIES,
> -						   retry_for_again_or_busy);
> +						   can_retry);
>  			if (err)
>  				printf("error %d %d\n", err, errno);
>  			assert(err == 0);
>  			err = map_update_retriable(fd, &key, &value, BPF_EXIST, MAP_RETRIES,
> -						   retry_for_again_or_busy);
> +						   can_retry);
>  			if (err)
>  				printf("error %d %d\n", err, errno);
>  			assert(err == 0);





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux