Re: [PATCH v7 12/14] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Introduce struct arm_smmu_vmaster

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Feb 25, 2025 at 05:08:16PM +0000, Pranjal Shrivastava wrote:
> > @@ -824,6 +829,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_master {
> >         struct arm_smmu_device          *smmu;
> >         struct device                   *dev;
> >         struct arm_smmu_stream          *streams;
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD
> > +       struct arm_smmu_vmaster         *vmaster; /* use smmu->streams_mutex */
> > +#endif
> >         /* Locked by the iommu core using the group mutex */
> >         struct arm_smmu_ctx_desc_cfg    cd_table;
> >         unsigned int                    num_streams;
> > @@ -972,6 +980,9 @@ struct arm_smmu_attach_state {
> >         bool disable_ats;
> >         ioasid_t ssid;
> >         /* Resulting state */
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD
> > +       struct arm_smmu_vmaster *vmaster;
> > +#endif
> >         bool ats_enabled;
> >  };
> > 
> 
> Umm.. I'm not too sure how I feel about these #ifdefs _between_ a struct
> definition. Given that currently, the arm_smmu_v3.h file doesn't have
> such `#ifdef CONFIG`s between structs. I'd say, in case
> CONFIG_ARM_SMMU_V3_IOMMUFD is turned off, we can simply leave the
> vmaster ptr NULL?
 
OK. Will drop..

Nicolin




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux