[PATCH rcu 09/11] rcutorture: Complain when invalid SRCU reader_flavor is specified

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>

Currently, rcutorture ignores reader_flavor bits that are not in the
SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ALL bitmask, which could confuse rcutorture users into
believing buggy patches had been fully tested.  This commit therefore
produces a splat in this case.

Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c | 2 ++
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
index 9c9a349b9c7f..be4e3c6b912f 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
+++ b/kernel/rcu/rcutorture.c
@@ -689,6 +689,8 @@ static int srcu_torture_read_lock(void)
 	int idx;
 	int ret = 0;
 
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(reader_flavor & ~SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ALL);
+
 	if ((reader_flavor & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_NORMAL) || !(reader_flavor & SRCU_READ_FLAVOR_ALL)) {
 		idx = srcu_read_lock(srcu_ctlp);
 		WARN_ON_ONCE(idx & ~0x1);
-- 
2.39.5 (Apple Git-154)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux