Anna Nyiri wrote: > Paolo Abeni <pabeni@xxxxxxxxxx> ezt írta (időpont: 2025. febr. 11., K, 12:19): > > > > On 2/10/25 8:22 PM, Anna Emese Nyiri wrote: > > > Introduce tests to verify the correct functionality of the SO_RCVMARK and > > > SO_RCVPRIORITY socket options. > > > > > > Key changes include: > > > > > > - so_rcv_listener.c: Implements a receiver application to test the correct > > > behavior of the SO_RCVMARK and SO_RCVPRIORITY options. > > > - test_so_rcv.sh: Provides a shell script to automate testing for these options. > > > - Makefile: Integrates test_so_rcv.sh into the kernel selftests. > > > > > > v2: > > > > > > - Add the C part to TEST_GEN_PROGS and .gitignore. > > > - Modify buffer space and add IPv6 testing option > > > in so_rcv_listener.c. > > > - Add IPv6 testing, remove unnecessary comment, > > > add kselftest exit codes, run both binaries in a namespace, > > > and add sleep in test_so_rcv.sh. > > > The sleep was added to ensure that the listener process has > > > enough time to start before the sender attempts to connect. > > > - Rebased on net-next. > > > > > > v1: > > > > > > https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20250129143601.16035-2-annaemesenyiri@xxxxxxxxx/ > > > > Unfortunately the added self-test does not run successfully in the CI: > > I think the test is not running because it is added to TEST_GEN_PROGS. > However, after reconsidering, I'm not sure it should be there, since > this test does not run on its own but is executed by the > test_so_rcv.sh shell script. > Wouldn't it be more appropriate to add so_rcv_listener to > TEST_GEN_FILES instead? Yes, +TEST_PROGS += test_so_rcv.sh is correct, as this needs to be called from kselftest. +TEST_GEN_PROGS += so_rcv_listener needs to be TEST_GEN_FILES as it is not intended to be called directly. Documentation/dev-tools/kselftest.rst for details.
