On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 10:13:37AM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
> The test already prints the same information on failure; remove
> redundant pr_debug() logs.
...
> #define _check_numbers_template(arg_fmt, expect, str, fmt, n_args, ap) \
> do { \
> - pr_debug("\"%s\", \"%s\" ->\n", str, fmt); \
What *if* the n_args == 0 here?
> for (; n_args > 0; n_args--, expect++) { \
> typeof(*expect) got = *va_arg(ap, typeof(expect)); \
> - pr_debug("\t" arg_fmt "\n", got); \
> if (got != *expect) { \
> pr_warn("vsscanf(\"%s\", \"%s\", ...) expected " arg_fmt " got " arg_fmt "\n", \
> str, fmt, *expect, got); \
> @@ -689,7 +687,6 @@ do { \
> total_tests++; \
> len = snprintf(test_buffer, BUF_SIZE, gen_fmt, expect); \
> got = (fn)(test_buffer, &endp, base); \
> - pr_debug(#fn "(\"%s\", %d) -> " gen_fmt "\n", test_buffer, base, got); \
> if (got != (expect)) { \
> fail = true; \
> pr_warn(#fn "(\"%s\", %d): got " gen_fmt " expected " gen_fmt "\n", \
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
