On 10.02.25 20:35, John Hubbard wrote:
On 2/9/25 11:54 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
On Sat, 8 Feb 2025 at 18:53, Yury Norov <yury.norov@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, Feb 07, 2025 at 03:14:01PM -0500, Tamir Duberstein wrote:
On 7/27/24 12:35 AM, Shuah Khan wrote:
...
The crux of the argument seems to be that the config help text is taken
to describe the author's intent with the fragment "at boot". I think
IMO, "at boot" is a misnomer, as most tests can be either builtin
or modular.
Right.
KUNIT is disabled in defconfig, at least on x86_64. It is also disabled
on my Ubuntu 24.04 machine. If I take your patches, I'll be unable to
OK so I just bought a shiny new test machine, and installed one of the
big name distros on it, hoping they've moved ahead and bought into the kunit
story...
$ grep KUNIT /boot/config-6.8.0-52-generic
# CONFIG_KUNIT is not set
...gagghh! No such luck. One more data point, in support of Yuri's complaint. :)
I think distros should start setting CONFIG_KUNIT=m.
Yes they should! kunit really does have important advantages for many use
cases, including bitmaps here, and "CONFIG_KUNIT is not set" is the main
obstacle.
> > Let me add a few people to Cc who might be able to influence some
distros.
thanks,
Fedora has it.
CS-10 has it (-> RHEL-10):
redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KUNIT:CONFIG_KUNIT=m
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/src/kernel/centos-stream-10/-/blob/main/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KUNIT?ref_type=heads
CS-9 has it (-> RHEL-9):
redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KUNIT:CONFIG_KUNIT=m
https://gitlab.com/redhat/centos-stream/src/kernel/centos-stream-9/-/blob/main/redhat/configs/common/generic/CONFIG_KUNIT?ref_type=heads
So I think from the RH side everything is properly set?
Let me CC Nico, he did some KUNIT work in the past.
--
Cheers,
David / dhildenb
