On 2/3/25 6:01 PM, Peter Seiderer wrote: > Enable additional to 'parm value' the 'param=value' parsing It could be language bias on my side, by I find the above statement hard to parse. Could you please rephrase it? IMHO something alike: """ Enable more flexible parameters syntax, allowing "param=value" in addition to the already supported "param value" pattern. """ Thanks, Paolo