Re: [PATCH net-next v18 17/25] ovpn: implement keepalive mechanism

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



2025-01-13, 10:31:36 +0100, Antonio Quartulli wrote:
> +void ovpn_xmit_special(struct ovpn_peer *peer, const void *data,
> +		       const unsigned int len)
> +{
> +	struct ovpn_priv *ovpn;
> +	struct sk_buff *skb;
> +
> +	ovpn = peer->ovpn;
> +	if (unlikely(!ovpn))
> +		return;
> +
> +	skb = alloc_skb(256 + len, GFP_ATOMIC);
> +	if (unlikely(!skb))
> +		return;
> +
> +	skb_reserve(skb, 128);
> +	skb->priority = TC_PRIO_BESTEFFORT;
> +	__skb_put_data(skb, data, len);
> +
> +	/* increase reference counter when passing peer to sending queue */
> +	if (!ovpn_peer_hold(peer)) {
> +		netdev_dbg(ovpn->dev,
> +			   "cannot hold peer reference for sending special packet\n");
> +		kfree_skb(skb);
> +		return;
> +	}
> +
> +	ovpn_send(ovpn, skb, peer);
> +}

[...]
> +static void ovpn_peer_keepalive_send(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> +	struct ovpn_peer *peer = container_of(work, struct ovpn_peer,
> +					      keepalive_work);
> +
> +	local_bh_disable();
> +	ovpn_xmit_special(peer, ovpn_keepalive_message,
> +			  sizeof(ovpn_keepalive_message));
> +	local_bh_enable();
> +	ovpn_peer_put(peer);

nit: could we simply drop this put and the hold in ovpn_xmit_special?
ovpn_peer_keepalive_send has a reference on the peer from the WQ, just
transfer it to ovpn_xmit_special and then ovpn_send. No need to
pretend to acquire one for ovpn_send's sake and drop the one we got
from the WQ? (ovpn_xmit_special would need to _put(peer) in case of
early return)

> +}

-- 
Sabrina




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux