On Thu Jan 23, 2025 at 11:30 PM EET, Jarkko Sakkinen wrote: > On Thu Jan 23, 2025 at 3:53 PM EET, Vignesh Raman wrote: > > We are working towards creating a generic, upstream GitLab-CI pipeline > > (kci-gitlab) that will replace DRM-CI [1]. The proposed GitLab-CI pipeline > > is designed with a distributed infrastructure model, making it possible > > to run on any gitLab instance. We plan to leverage KernelCI [2] as the > > backend, utilizing its hardware, rootfs, test plans, and KCIDB [3] > > integration. > > Why can't you keep the next version of your great pipeline outside the > kernel tree? > > If there is a legit motivation for doing that, why it needs to be bound > to Gitlab? Why can't you make script callable from any CI? To add, most of the distributions have their CI pipelines but they don't proactively push them over here. BR, Jarkko
