Re: [PATCH RFC v3 02/10] sched_getattr: port to copy_struct_to_user

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2024-12-11 at 11:23 +0100, Christian Brauner wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 10, 2024 at 07:14:07PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> > * Aleksa Sarai:
> > 
> > > sched_getattr(2) doesn't care about trailing non-zero bytes in the
> > > (ksize > usize) case, so just use copy_struct_to_user() without checking
> > > ignored_trailing.
> > 
> > I think this is what causes glibc's misc/tst-sched_setattr test to fail
> > on recent kernels.  The previous non-modifying behavior was documented
> > in the manual page:
> > 
> >        If the caller-provided attr buffer is larger than the kernel's
> >        sched_attr structure, the additional bytes in the user-space
> >        structure are not touched.
> > 
> > I can just drop this part of the test if the kernel deems both behaviors
> > valid.

> I think in general both behaviors are valid but I would consider zeroing
> the unknown parts of the provided buffer to be the safer option. And all
> newer extensible struct system calls do that.

Florian,

So should we drop the test before Glibc-2.41 release?  I'm seeing the
failure during my machine test.

-- 
Xi Ruoyao <xry111@xxxxxxxxxxx>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux