On Fri, 17 Jan 2025 13:49:23 +0100 Petr Machata wrote: > This logging and xfail handling duplicates lib.sh. Would a patch like > below be OK with you? The gist of it is to just use check_err, log_test > and xfail_on_slow from lib.sh to achieve what the test open-codes. Hm, maybe? I'm not going to say no if you send a patch, but IMHO if we were to change the output I think we should make it ktap.
