On Wed, Jan 08, 2025 at 07:07:57PM +0200, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
> intptr_t and uintptr_t are not big enough types on 32-bit architectures
> when printing 64-bit values, resulting to the following incorrect
> diagnostic output:
>
> # get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (3134324433)
>
> Replace intptr_t and uintptr_t with intmax_t and uintmax_t, respectively.
> With this fix, the same test produces more usable diagnostic output:
>
> # get_syscall_info.c:209:get_syscall_info:Expected exp_args[2] (3134324433) == info.entry.args[1] (18446744072548908753)
>
> Fixes: b5bb6d3068ea ("selftests/seccomp: fix 32-bit build warnings")
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry V. Levin <ldv@xxxxxxxxx>
Ah nice, thanks!
Reviewed-by: Kees Cook <kees@xxxxxxxxxx>
--
Kees Cook
