On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 06:42:42PM +0100, Niklas Cassel wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 31, 2024 at 06:43:41PM +0530, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote:
>
> (...)
>
> > + # RUN pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.COPY_TEST ...
> > + # OK pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.COPY_TEST
> > + ok 11 pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.COPY_TEST
> > + # PASSED: 11 / 11 tests passed.
> > + # Totals: pass:11 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0
> > +
> > +
> > +Testcase 11 (pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.COPY_TEST) will fail for most of the DMA
> > +capable endpoint controllers due to the absence of the MEMCPY over DMA. For such
> > +controllers, it is advisable to skip the forementioned testcase using below
> > +command::
>
> Hm.. this is strictly not correct. If will currently fail because pci-epf-test.c
> does:
> if ((reg->flags & FLAG_USE_DMA) && epf_test->dma_private)
> return -EINVAL;
>
> So even if a DMA driver has support for the DMA_MEMCPY cap, if the DMA driver
> also has the DMA_PRIVATE cap, this test will fail because of the code in
> pci-epf-test.c.
>
Right. But I think the condition should be changed to test for the MEMCPY
capability instead. Like,
diff --git a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
index ef6677f34116..0b211d60a85b 100644
--- a/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
+++ b/drivers/pci/endpoint/functions/pci-epf-test.c
@@ -328,7 +328,7 @@ static void pci_epf_test_copy(struct pci_epf_test *epf_test,
void *copy_buf = NULL, *buf;
if (reg->flags & FLAG_USE_DMA) {
- if (epf_test->dma_private) {
+ if (!dma_has_cap(DMA_MEMCPY, epf_test->dma_chan_tx->device->cap_mask)) {
dev_err(dev, "Cannot transfer data using DMA\n");
ret = -EINVAL;
goto set_status;
> Not sure how to formulate this properly... Perhaps:
> Testcase 11 (pci_ep_data_transfer.dma.COPY_TEST) will fail for DMA drivers that
> have the DMA_PRIVATE cap set. For DMA drivers which have the DMA_PRIVATE cap
> set, it is advisable to skip the forementioned testcase using below command::
>
> > +
> > + # pci_endpoint_test -f pci_ep_basic -v memcpy -T COPY_TEST -v dma
>
> Is this really correct? I would guess that it should be
> pci_endpoint_test -f pci_ep_data_transfer -v memcpy -T COPY_TEST -v dma
>
ah, typo. Thanks for catching!
>
> (...)
>
> > +TEST_F(pci_ep_basic, BAR_TEST)
> > +{
> > + int ret, i;
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i <= 5; i++) {
> > + pci_ep_ioctl(PCITEST_BAR, i);
> > + EXPECT_FALSE(ret) TH_LOG("Test failed for BAR%d", i);
> > + }
> > +}
>
> From looking at this function, will we still be able to test a single BAR?
> Previous pcitest.c allowed us to do pcitest -b <barno> to only test a
> specific BAR. I think that is a useful feature that we shouldn't remove.
>
> It would be nice if we could do something like:
> # pci_endpoint_test -f pci_ep_basic -T BAR_TEST -v <barno>
>
I'll try to add it.
>
> (...)
>
> > +
> > +TEST_F(pci_ep_data_transfer, COPY_TEST)
> > +{
> > + struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param param = {0};
>
> This (also other places in this file) can be written as:
> struct pci_endpoint_test_xfer_param param = {};
>
Ack.
- Mani
--
மணிவண்ணன் சதாசிவம்
