On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 10:28:16PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote: > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 11:24:29PM +0200, Vladimir Oltean wrote: > > On Mon, Dec 02, 2024 at 09:39:15PM +0100, Christian Marangi wrote: > > > Mhh the problem seems to be -c > > > > > > Let me post some outputs... > > > > > > root@OpenWrt:~# ping -V > > > ping from iputils 20240117 > > > libcap: no, IDN: no, NLS: no, error.h: no, getrandom(): yes, __fpending(): yes > > > root@OpenWrt:~# ping -c 10 192.168.1.1 > > > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.102 ms > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.084 ms > > > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.236 ms > > > ^C > > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > > > 3 packets transmitted, 3 received, 0% packet loss, time 2080ms > > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.084/0.140/0.236/0.067 ms > > > root@OpenWrt:~# ping 192.168.1.1 -c 10 > > > ping: -c: Name does not resolve > > > > > > As you can see swapping the ip cause this "Name does not resolve" error. > > > > Ok, I opened the iputils source code and there isn't any relevant recent > > change there. But it uses getopt(3), and that seems to be implemented > > more simplistically for musl libc: > > https://wiki.musl-libc.org/functional-differences-from-glibc.html > > "musl and the POSIX standard getopt stop processing options at the first > > non-option argument with no permutation." > > > > On GNU libc: > > $ ping 192.168.1.1 -c 1 > > PING 192.168.1.1 (192.168.1.1) 56(84) bytes of data. > > 64 bytes from 192.168.1.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.696 ms > > > > --- 192.168.1.1 ping statistics --- > > 1 packets transmitted, 1 received, 0% packet loss, time 0ms > > rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.696/0.696/0.696/0.000 ms > > Well it's definitely that... As we use musl as glibc is BIIIG and won't > ever fit 4mb of flash ahahha > > Also I just notice msend suffer the very same problem... > > root@OpenWrt:~# ip vrf exec vlan1 msend -g ff2e::0102:0304 -I lan1 -c 1 > Now sending to multicast group: [ff2e::0102:0304]:4444 > sendto: Address family not supported by protocol > root@OpenWrt:~# ip vrf exec vlan1 msend -I lan1 -c -g 1ff2e::0102:0304 > Now sending to multicast group: [224.1.1.1]:4444 > Sending msg 1, TTL 1, to [224.1.1.1]:4444: > Sending msg 2, TTL 1, to [224.1.1.1]:4444: > Ignore the last part about msend... just me messing around... -- Ansuel
