Re: [PATCH] selftest: hugetlb_dio: Fix test naming

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 11/28/24 18:14, Mark Brown wrote:
On Thu, Nov 28, 2024 at 10:46:56AM +0530, Donet Tom wrote:
On 11/27/24 21:44, Mark Brown wrote:
+	ksft_test_result(free_hpage_a == free_hpage_b,
+			 "free huge pages from %u-%u\n", start_off, end_off);
This test allocates a hugetlb buffer and adjusts the start and end offsets of the buffer based
on|start_off|  and|end_off|. The adjusted buffer is then used for Direct I/O (DIO). If I understand
correctly,|start_off|  and|end_off|  are not free huge pages but rather DIO buffer offsets. Should we
change this message to "Hugetlb DIO buffer offset"?
Sure, so long as the message is consistent it doesn't really matter what
it is from the point of view of the tooling.  I also noticed while doing
this that the test doesn't verify that a huge page is actually used at
any point, I was thinking about doing an incremental change for that
too.

Sure. Thank you.


Please fix your mail client to word wrap within paragraphs at something
substantially less than 80 columns.  Doing this makes your messages much
easier to read and reply to.




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux