On 11/18/24 1:34 AM, Zhu Jun wrote:
the variable is never referenced in the code, just remove them.
Signed-off-by: Zhu Jun <zhujun2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
index 27676a04d0b6..5d1678b15d8b 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c
@@ -191,7 +191,6 @@ static void bpf_prog_load_log_buf(void)
ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "bad_fd");
if (fd >= 0)
close(fd);
- fd = -1;
free(log_buf);
}
This patch failed to apply to latest bpf-next.
$ git apply ~/p1.txt
error: patch failed: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c:191
error: tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/log_buf.c: patch does not apply
The reason is the above 'fd = -1' already gone:
188 ASSERT_OK_PTR(strstr(log_buf, "R0 !read_ok"), "bad_log_0");
189 ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "bad_fd");
190 if (fd >= 0)
191 close(fd);
192
193 free(log_buf);
194 }
@@ -259,7 +258,6 @@ static void bpf_btf_load_log_buf(void)
ASSERT_LT(fd, 0, "bad_fd");
if (fd >= 0)
close(fd);
- fd = -1;
cleanup:
free(log_buf);
There are more redundant 'fd = -1' in function bpf_btf_load_log_buf(),
you may want to remove them as well.
