On Fri, Nov 8, 2024 at 1:16 AM Donald Hunter <donald.hunter@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > It's then a question of whether we need the repeat logic in poll_ntf() > because it's always possible to use check_ntf() in your own repeat > logic. Either way, I'd prefer not to call the parameter "max_retries" > because semantically I don't think we are retrying - it is a count of > how many times to repeat the poll. Thoughts? Should it be a "duration" > parameter? Yes, a "duration" is better. The meaning of "retry" or "count" is not clear. The original check_ntf() is good enough for the test case in this series. Could you make the change, or do you prefer me to submit another patch?
