Hi Andrew, On Wed, Nov 6, 2024 at 10:17 PM Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, 6 Nov 2024 09:33:55 +0100 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > This conflicts with "[PATCH] m68k: defconfig: Update defconfigs for > > > v6.12-rc1"[1]. Of course the proper way forward would be to add > > > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" to all tests that still lack it, so I can > > > just never queue that patch ;-) > > > > What's the status of this series? I am asking because I am wondering if > > I should queue [1] for v6.13, or just drop it, and send a patch to add > > "default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS" instead. > > > > I saw the email from Andrew stating he applied it to his tree[2], > > but that seems to have been dropped silently, and never made it into > > linux-next? > > Yes, sorry. Believe it or not, I do try to avoid spraying out too many > emails. David will recall better than I, but things got messy. > https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20241009162719.0adaea37@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx was > perhaps the cause. Fair enough. > I'm sure David can being us up to date. Probably the best solution is to respin after v6.13-rc1, to be included in v6.13-rc2. Gr{oetje,eeting}s, Geert -- Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that. -- Linus Torvalds
