On Mon, Oct 28, 2024 at 11:24:10AM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> > +/**
> > + * iommufd_viommu_alloc_hwpt_nested() - Get a hwpt_nested for a vIOMMU
> > + * @viommu: vIOMMU ojbect to associate the hwpt_nested/domain with
> > + * @user_data: user_data pointer. Must be valid
> > + *
> > + * Allocate a new IOMMU_DOMAIN_NESTED for a vIOMMU and return it as a NESTED
> > + * hw_pagetable.
> > + */
> > +static struct iommufd_hwpt_nested *
> > +iommufd_viommu_alloc_hwpt_nested(struct iommufd_viommu *viommu, u32 flags,
> > + const struct iommu_user_data *user_data)
> > +{
> > + struct iommufd_hwpt_nested *hwpt_nested;
> > + struct iommufd_hw_pagetable *hwpt;
> > + int rc;
> > +
> > + if (flags)
> > + return ERR_PTR(-EOPNOTSUPP);
>
> This check should be removed.
>
> When a user page fault is required, IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID is set.
> if (cmd->flags & IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID) {
It can't just be removed..
I suspect that IOMMU_HWPT_FAULT_ID_VALID should not be set on the
nested domain but on the parent?
Jason
