Re: [PATCH for-next 1/3] selftests/watchdog: add count parameter for watchdog-test

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 




On 27/10/2024 08:28, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 10/24/24 19:39, Li Zhijian wrote:
>> Currently, watchdog-test keep running until it gets a SIGINT. However,
>> when watchdog-test is executed from the kselftests framework, where it
>> launches test via timeout which will send SIGTERM in time up. This could
>> lead to
>> 1. watchdog haven't stop, a watchdog reset is triggered to reboot the OS
>>     in silent.
>> 2. kselftests gets an timeout exit code, and judge watchdog-test as
>>    'not ok'
>>
> This test isn't really supposed to be run from kselftest framework.
> This is the reason why it isn't included in the default run.

May I know what's the default run, is it different from `make run_tests` ?


> 
>> This patch is prepare to fix above 2 issues
> 
> This series needs a separate cover letter explaining how this problem is
> being fixed.

Cover letter is in this patch, see below:
In addition, we can get the 'How' by reading the simple change in each change.


> 
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Li Zhijian <lizhijian@xxxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> Hey,
>> Cover letter is here.
>>
>> It's notice that a OS reboot was triggerred after ran the watchdog-test
>> in kselftests framwork 'make run_tests', that's because watchdog-test
>> didn't stop feeding the watchdog after enable it.
>>
>> In addition, current watchdog-test didn't adapt to the kselftests
>> framework which launchs the test with /usr/bin/timeout and no timeout
>> is expected.
>> --- 




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux