Re: [PATCH v2] selftests: tmpfs: Add kselftest support to tmpfs

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/26/24 13:16, Shivam Chaudhary wrote:
Add kselftest support for open, linkat, unshare, mount tests

- Replace direct error handling with
  `ksft_test_result_*` macros for better reporting
   of test outcomes.

- Add `ksft_print_header()` and `ksft_set_plan()`
  to structure test outputs more effectively.

- Introduce the helper function `is_unshare()` to
   handle unshare() related checks.

- Improve the test flow by adding more detailed pass/fail
   reporting for unshare, mounting, file opening, and linking
   operations.

- Skip the test if it's not run as root, providing an
   appropriate Warning.

Test logs:

Before change:

- Without root
  error: unshare, errno 1

- With root
  No, output

After change:

- Without root
  TAP version 13
  1..1
  ok 1 # SKIP This test needs root to run

- With root
  TAP version 13
  1..1
  ok 1 unshare(): we have a new mount namespace.
  1..2
  ok 2 mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success
  1..3
  ok 3 mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success
  1..4
  ok 4 openat(): Open first temporary file: Success
  1..5
  ok 5 linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success
  1..6
  ok 6 openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success
  # Totals: pass:6 fail:0 xfail:0 xpass:0 skip:0 error:0

Signed-off-by: Shivam Chaudhary <cvam0000@xxxxxxxxx>
---
Notes:
	Changes in v2:
   		- Make the commit message more clear.
link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20241024200228.1075840-1-cvam0000@xxxxxxxxx/T/#u

  .../selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c      | 72 +++++++++++++++----
  1 file changed, 58 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c
index b5c3ddb90942..26dea19c1614 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/tmpfs/bug-link-o-tmpfile.c
@@ -23,45 +23,89 @@
  #include <sys/mount.h>
  #include <unistd.h>
-int main(void)
-{
-	int fd;
+#include "../kselftest.h"
- if (unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) == -1) {
+static int is_unshare(int flag)

Why do you need a new routine for this? Looks at
other tests that do root check. You can use getuid
in the main*( before trying unshare.

+{
+	if (unshare(flag) == -1) {
  		if (errno == ENOSYS || errno == EPERM) {
-			fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
-			return 4;
+			ksft_test_result_fail("error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
+			return -1; // Return -1 for failure

Match the comment style in the file which /*

  		}
  		fprintf(stderr, "error: unshare, errno %d\n", errno);
+		return -1;
+	}
+
+	return 0; // Return 0 for success

Same comment here.

+}
+
+int main(void)
+{
+	int fd;
+
+	// Setting up kselftest framework
+	ksft_print_header();
+	ksft_set_plan(1);
+
+	// Check if test is run as root
+	if (geteuid()) {
+		ksft_test_result_skip("This test needs root to run!\n");
  		return 1;
  	}
-	if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE|MS_REC, NULL) == -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "error: mount '/', errno %d\n", errno);
+
+	if (is_unshare(CLONE_NEWNS) == 0) {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("unshare(): we have a new mount namespace.\n");
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_fail("unshare(): failed\n");
  		return 1;
  	}
+ ksft_set_plan(2);

Move set_plan up to the top

+
+	if (mount(NULL, "/", NULL, MS_PRIVATE | MS_REC, NULL) == -1) {
+		ksft_test_result_fail("mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Fail %d\n", errno);
+		return 1;
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("mount(): Root filesystem private mount: Success\n");
+	}
+
+	ksft_set_plan(3);

Hmm. Why add another set_plan - one plan for all tests is sufficient.

  	/* Our heroes: 1 root inode, 1 O_TMPFILE inode, 1 permanent inode. */
  	if (mount(NULL, "/tmp", "tmpfs", 0, "nr_inodes=3") == -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "error: mount tmpfs, errno %d\n", errno);
+		ksft_test_result_fail("mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Fail %d\n", errno);
  		return 1;
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("mount(): Mounting tmpfs on /tmp: Success\n");
  	}
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600);
+	ksft_set_plan(4);

Too many set_plans - check the usage in other tests.

+	fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600);
  	if (fd == -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "error: open 1, errno %d\n", errno);
+		ksft_test_result_fail("openat(): Open first temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
  		return 1;
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("openat(): Open first temporary file: Success\n");
  	}
+
+	ksft_set_plan(5);

Again.

  	if (linkat(fd, "", AT_FDCWD, "/tmp/1", AT_EMPTY_PATH) == -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "error: linkat, errno %d\n", errno);
+		ksft_test_result_fail("linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
+		close(fd); // Ensure fd is closed on failure
  		return 1;
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("linkat(): Linking the temporary file: Success\n");
  	}
  	close(fd);
- fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY|O_TMPFILE, 0600);
+	ksft_set_plan(6);
+	fd = openat(AT_FDCWD, "/tmp", O_WRONLY | O_TMPFILE, 0600);
  	if (fd == -1) {
-		fprintf(stderr, "error: open 2, errno %d\n", errno);
+		ksft_test_result_fail("openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Fail %d\n", errno);
  		return 1;
+	} else {
+		ksft_test_result_pass("openat(): Opening the second temporary file: Success\n");
  	}
+ ksft_exit_pass();
  	return 0;
  }

This is a small test and there is no need to add these may set_plan() calls.

thanks,
-- Shuah




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux