Re: [Bug Report] Wrong value of __NR_userfaultfd in asm-generic/unistd.h

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





Am 21.10.24 um 08:48 schrieb Muhammad Usama Anjum:
Hi,

The asm-generic/unistd.h file has wrong __NR_userfaultfd syscall number which
doesn't even depend on the architecture. This has caused failure of a selftest
which was fixed recently [1].

grep -rnIF "#define __NR_userfaultfd"
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_32.h:374:#define __NR_userfaultfd 374
arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_64.h:327:#define __NR_userfaultfd 323
arch/x86/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd_x32.h:282:#define __NR_userfaultfd (__X32_SYSCALL_BIT + 323)
arch/arm/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd-eabi.h:347:#define __NR_userfaultfd (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE + 388)
arch/arm/include/generated/uapi/asm/unistd-oabi.h:359:#define __NR_userfaultfd (__NR_SYSCALL_BASE + 388)
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282

The number is dependent on the architecture. The above data shows that it
is different for different arch:
x86	374
x86_64	323
ARM     347/358

It seems include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd has wrong 282 value in it. Maybe I'm
missing some context.. Please have a look at it.

The __NR_userfaultfd was added to include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h in
09f7298100ea ("Subject: [PATCH] userfaultfd: register uapi generic syscall (aarch64)").

This is not specific to __NR_userfaultfd, just take a look at some of the other syscalls (e.g., __NR_membarrier).

Now, some of the files you list above are "generated". Doing it on a clean tree:

$ grep -rnIF "#define __NR_userfaultfd"
arch/arm64/include/asm/unistd32.h:789:#define __NR_userfaultfd 388
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282
include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h:681:#define __NR_userfaultfd 282


But now comes the tricky part: an architecture defines whether it wants to

(a) Use the asm-generic unistd.h
(b) Use a custom one

E.g.,

$ cat include/uapi/linux/unistd.h
/* SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0 WITH Linux-syscall-note */
#ifndef _LINUX_UNISTD_H_
#define _LINUX_UNISTD_H_

/*
 * Include machine specific syscall numbers
 */
#include <asm/unistd.h>

#endif /* _LINUX_UNISTD_H_ */


For example on riscv arch/riscv/include/asm/unistd.h will include arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h which will include "asm-generic/unistd.h".

If you follow the flow on x86, you'll find that it will not include that asm-generic one as default.

So the asm-generic variant only applies if an arch wants to do it in the generic way.

$ find tools -name unistd.h
tools/arch/x86/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/arch/arc/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/arch/riscv/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/arch/hexagon/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/arch/arm64/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/unistd.h
tools/include/uapi/asm-generic/unistd.h
tools/include/nolibc/unistd.h

Consequently, the asm-generic one should never be used directly.

--
Cheers,

David / dhildenb





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux