On 9/23/24 15:18, Yifei Liu wrote:
On Sep 23, 2024, at 1:56 PM, Shuah Khan <skhan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9/23/24 14:47, Yifei Liu wrote:
We recently notice that the step_after_suspend_test would
noticed
How about change this to find?
Either is fine - it would found instead of find - or you could write
it as below:
"step_after_suspend_test fails with device busy error while
writing to /sys/power/state to start suspend."
fail on our plenty devices. The test believesit failed to
"several of our devices" believes it
enter suspend state with
Please do fix the above as pointed out earlier on v1.
Apologies, forget to fix. Will fix that.
$ sudo ./step_after_suspend_test
TAP version 13
Bail out! Failed to enter Suspend state
However, in the kernel message, I indeed see the system get
suspended and then wake up later.
[611172.033108] PM: suspend entry (s2idle)
[611172.044940] Filesystems sync: 0.006 seconds
[611172.052254] Freezing user space processes
[611172.059319] Freezing user space processes completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[611172.067920] OOM killer disabled.
[611172.072465] Freezing remaining freezable tasks
[611172.080332] Freezing remaining freezable tasks completed (elapsed 0.001 seconds)
[611172.089724] printk: Suspending console(s) (use no_console_suspend to debug)
[611172.117126] serial 00:03: disabled
--- some other hardware get reconnected ---
[611203.136277] OOM killer enabled.
[611203.140637] Restarting tasks ...
[611203.141135] usb 1-8.1: USB disconnect, device number 7
[611203.141755] done.
[611203.155268] random: crng reseeded on system resumption
[611203.162059] PM: suspend exit
After investigation, I notice that for the code block
noticed?
How about use find here?
It is the tense issue - found or noticed would work.
if (write(power_state_fd, "mem", strlen("mem")) != strlen("mem"))
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to enter Suspend state\n");
The write will return -1 and errno is set to 16 (device busy).
It should be caused by the write function is not successfully returned
before the system suspend and the return value get messed when waking up.
As a result, It may be better to check the time passed of those few instructions
to determine whether the suspend is executed correctly for it is pretty hard to
execute those few lines for 5 seconds.
The timer to wake up the system is set to expired after 5 seconds and no-rearm.
If the timer remaining time is 0 second and 0 nano secomd, it means the timer
expired and wake the system up. Otherwise, the system could be considered to
enter the suspend state failed if there is any remaining time.
What would you get if you were to cat /sys/power/state at this point?
According to file kernel/power/suspend, the cat will always return freeze mem disk.
Does this fix the problem you are seeing? What is the outcome?
Yes, it fixes. The test would not fail for it believes the system does not went to suspend by mistake. It now could continue to the rest part of the test after suspend.
Can you add this to the change log.
Fixes: bfd092b8c2728 ("selftests: breakpoint: add step_after_suspend_test")
Reported-by: Sinadin Shan <sinadin.shan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yifei Liu <yifei.l.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
.../testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c | 5 ++++-
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
index dfec31fb9b30d..33f5542bf741d 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/breakpoints/step_after_suspend_test.c
@@ -152,7 +152,10 @@ void suspend(void)
if (err < 0)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("timerfd_settime() failed\n");
- if (write(power_state_fd, "mem", strlen("mem")) != strlen("mem"))
+ system("(echo mem > /sys/power/state) 2> /dev/null");
+
+ timerfd_gettime(timerfd,&spec);
+ if (spec.it_value.tv_sec != 0 || spec.it_value.tv_nsec != 0)
ksft_exit_fail_msg("Failed to enter Suspend state\n");
close(timerfd);
thanks,
-- Shuah
