[PATCH bpf-next v6 2/8] libbpf: Fix header comment typos for BTF.ext

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Mention struct btf_ext_info_sec rather than non-existent btf_sec_func_info
in BTF.ext struct documentation.

Signed-off-by: Tony Ambardar <tony.ambardar@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
index 408df59e0771..8cda511a1982 100644
--- a/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
+++ b/tools/lib/bpf/libbpf_internal.h
@@ -448,11 +448,11 @@ struct btf_ext_info {
  *
  * The func_info subsection layout:
  *   record size for struct bpf_func_info in the func_info subsection
- *   struct btf_sec_func_info for section #1
+ *   struct btf_ext_info_sec for section #1
  *   a list of bpf_func_info records for section #1
  *     where struct bpf_func_info mimics one in include/uapi/linux/bpf.h
  *     but may not be identical
- *   struct btf_sec_func_info for section #2
+ *   struct btf_ext_info_sec for section #2
  *   a list of bpf_func_info records for section #2
  *   ......
  *
-- 
2.34.1





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux