Re: [PATCH v4 21/30] riscv/traps: Introduce software check exception

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Deepak

Deepak Gupta <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx> 於 2024年9月13日 週五 上午2:32寫道:
>
> zicfiss / zicfilp introduces a new exception to priv isa `software check
> exception` with cause code = 18. This patch implements software check
> exception.
>
> Additionally it implements a cfi violation handler which checks for code
> in xtval. If xtval=2, it means that sw check exception happened because of
> an indirect branch not landing on 4 byte aligned PC or not landing on
> `lpad` instruction or label value embedded in `lpad` not matching label
> value setup in `x7`. If xtval=3, it means that sw check exception happened
> because of mismatch between link register (x1 or x5) and top of shadow
> stack (on execution of `sspopchk`).
>
> In case of cfi violation, SIGSEGV is raised with code=SEGV_CPERR.
> SEGV_CPERR was introduced by x86 shadow stack patches.
>
> Signed-off-by: Deepak Gupta <debug@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> ---
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h |  1 +
>  arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h   |  2 ++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S               |  3 ++
>  arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c               | 38 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  4 files changed, 44 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> index cd627ec289f1..5a27cefd7805 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/asm-prototypes.h
> @@ -51,6 +51,7 @@ DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_u);
>  DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_s);
>  DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_ecall_m);
>  DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_break);
> +DECLARE_DO_ERROR_INFO(do_trap_software_check);
>
>  asmlinkage void handle_bad_stack(struct pt_regs *regs);
>  asmlinkage void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs);
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> index 2293e535f865..4068c7e5452a 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> +++ b/arch/riscv/include/asm/entry-common.h
> @@ -39,4 +39,6 @@ static inline int handle_misaligned_store(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  }
>  #endif
>
> +bool handle_user_cfi_violation(struct pt_regs *regs);
> +
>  #endif /* _ASM_RISCV_ENTRY_COMMON_H */
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> index ca9203e6d76d..2ec75ba864a8 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/entry.S
> @@ -384,6 +384,9 @@ SYM_DATA_START_LOCAL(excp_vect_table)
>         RISCV_PTR do_page_fault   /* load page fault */
>         RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown
>         RISCV_PTR do_page_fault   /* store page fault */
> +       RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown /* cause=16 */
> +       RISCV_PTR do_trap_unknown /* cause=17 */
> +       RISCV_PTR do_trap_software_check /* cause=18 is sw check exception */
>  SYM_DATA_END_LABEL(excp_vect_table, SYM_L_LOCAL, excp_vect_table_end)
>
>  #ifndef CONFIG_MMU
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> index 51ebfd23e007..32d1453bed72 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/kernel/traps.c
> @@ -354,6 +354,44 @@ void do_trap_ecall_u(struct pt_regs *regs)
>
>  }
>
> +#define CFI_TVAL_FCFI_CODE     2
> +#define CFI_TVAL_BCFI_CODE     3
> +/* handle cfi violations */
> +bool handle_user_cfi_violation(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       bool ret = false;
> +       unsigned long tval = csr_read(CSR_TVAL);
> +
> +       if (((tval == CFI_TVAL_FCFI_CODE) && cpu_supports_indirect_br_lp_instr()) ||
> +               ((tval == CFI_TVAL_BCFI_CODE) && cpu_supports_shadow_stack())) {
> +               do_trap_error(regs, SIGSEGV, SEGV_CPERR, regs->epc,
> +                                         "Oops - control flow violation");
> +               ret = true;
> +       }
> +
> +       return ret;
> +}
> +/*
> + * software check exception is defined with risc-v cfi spec. Software check
> + * exception is raised when:-
> + * a) An indirect branch doesn't land on 4 byte aligned PC or `lpad`
> + *    instruction or `label` value programmed in `lpad` instr doesn't
> + *    match with value setup in `x7`. reported code in `xtval` is 2.
> + * b) `sspopchk` instruction finds a mismatch between top of shadow stack (ssp)
> + *    and x1/x5. reported code in `xtval` is 3.
> + */

It seems like this trap handler does not follow generic entry. This
can cause problems as signal delivery is done in
irqentry_exit_to_user_mode(). Please reference the commit f0bddf50586d
("riscv: entry: Convert to generic entry") for more information.

> +asmlinkage __visible __trap_section void do_trap_software_check(struct pt_regs *regs)
> +{
> +       if (user_mode(regs)) {
> +               /* not a cfi violation, then merge into flow of unknown trap handler */
> +               if (!handle_user_cfi_violation(regs))
> +                       do_trap_unknown(regs);
> +       } else {
> +               /* sw check exception coming from kernel is a bug in kernel */
> +               die(regs, "Kernel BUG");
> +       }
> +}
> +
>  #ifdef CONFIG_MMU
>  asmlinkage __visible noinstr void do_page_fault(struct pt_regs *regs)
>  {
> --
> 2.45.0
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> linux-riscv mailing list
> linux-riscv@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-riscv

Cheers,
Andy





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux