Increase the test coverage of list_test_list_replace*() by adding the checks to compare the pointer of "a_new.next" and "a_new.prev" to make sure a perfect circular doubly linked list is formed after the replacement. Signed-off-by: I Hsin Cheng <richard120310@xxxxxxxxx> --- lib/list-test.c | 4 ++++ 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+) diff --git a/lib/list-test.c b/lib/list-test.c index 37cbc33e9fdb..e207c4c98d70 100644 --- a/lib/list-test.c +++ b/lib/list-test.c @@ -102,6 +102,8 @@ static void list_test_list_replace(struct kunit *test) /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.prev, &list); } static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test) @@ -118,6 +120,8 @@ static void list_test_list_replace_init(struct kunit *test) /* now: [list] -> a_new -> b */ KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, list.next, &a_new); KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, b.prev, &a_new); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.next, &b); + KUNIT_EXPECT_PTR_EQ(test, a_new.prev, &list); /* check a_old is empty (initialized) */ KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, list_empty_careful(&a_old)); -- 2.43.0
