Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] selftests/net: integrate packetdrill with ksft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Jakub Kicinski wrote:
> On Thu, 05 Sep 2024 21:31:55 -0400 Willem de Bruijn wrote:
> > > Packetdrill scripts are sensitive to timing.
> > > On the dbg build, I just observe a flaky test.
> > > 
> > > The tool takes --tolerance_usecs and --tolerance_percent arguments.
> > > I may have to update ksft_runner.sh to increase one if a dbg build is
> > > detected.
> > > 
> > > Let me know if I should respin now. Else I can also follow-up.
> > > 
> > > Need to figure out how best to detect debug builds. It is not in
> > > uname, and no proc/config.gz. Existence of /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > > is a proxy for current kernel/configs/debug.config, if a bit crude.  
> > 
> > Should have kept on reading. Will use KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW:
> > 
> > +declare -a optargs
> > +if [[ "${KSFT_MACHINE_SLOW}" == "yes" ]]; then
> > +       optargs+=('--tolerance_usecs=10000')
> > +fi
> > +
> >  ktap_print_header
> >  ktap_set_plan 2
> > 
> > -packetdrill ${ipv4_args[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> > +packetdrill ${ipv4_args[@]} ${optargs[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> >         && ktap_test_pass "ipv4" || ktap_test_fail "ipv4"
> > -packetdrill ${ipv6_args[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> > +packetdrill ${ipv6_args[@]} ${optargs[@]} $(basename $script) > /dev/null \
> >         && ktap_test_pass "ipv6" || ktap_test_fail "ipv6"
> > 
> > 
> > > Another config affecting timing may be CONFIG_HZ. I did not observe
> > > issues with these specific scripts with CONFIG_HZ=250. It may have to
> > > be tackled eventually. Or CONFIG_HZ=1000 hardcoded in config.  
> >  
> > I will just add the CONFIG for now.
> 
> Not sure I follow the HZ idea, lowering the frequency helps stability?
> 
> We can see how well v2 does overnight, so far it's green:
> https://netdev.bots.linux.dev/contest.html?executor=vmksft-packetdrill-dbg
> (the net-next-2024-09-05--* branches had v1).

Great!

I saw one failure in manual runs and was unable to reproduce it with
a few more iterations. Let's see how it goes.

We do adjust these internally, to the same value for KASAN.
 
> FWIW status page lists two sets of packetdrill runners, probably 
> because I 'reused' an old team-driver runner instead of creating
> a new one. It should straighten itself out by tomorrow.






[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux