Re: [PATCH v4 5/5] powerpc/vdso: Wire up getrandom() vDSO implementation on PPC64

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Sep 02, 2024 at 02:04:42PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
>  SYM_FUNC_START(__arch_chacha20_blocks_nostack)
>  #ifdef __powerpc64__
> -	blr
> +	std	r5, -216(r1)
> +
> +	std	r14, -144(r1)
> +	std	r15, -136(r1)
> +	std	r16, -128(r1)
> +	std	r17, -120(r1)
> +	std	r18, -112(r1)
> +	std	r19, -104(r1)
> +	std	r20, -96(r1)
> +	std	r21, -88(r1)
> +	std	r22, -80(r1)
> +	std	r23, -72(r1)
> +	std	r24, -64(r1)
> +	std	r25, -56(r1)
> +	std	r26, -48(r1)
> +	std	r27, -40(r1)
> +	std	r28, -32(r1)
> +	std	r29, -24(r1)
> +	std	r30, -16(r1)
> +	std	r31, -8(r1)
>  #else
>  	stwu	r1, -96(r1)
>  	stw	r5, 20(r1)
> +#ifdef __BIG_ENDIAN__
>  	stmw	r14, 24(r1)
> +#else
> +	stw	r14, 24(r1)
> +	stw	r15, 28(r1)
> +	stw	r16, 32(r1)
> +	stw	r17, 36(r1)
> +	stw	r18, 40(r1)
> +	stw	r19, 44(r1)
> +	stw	r20, 48(r1)
> +	stw	r21, 52(r1)
> +	stw	r22, 56(r1)
> +	stw	r23, 60(r1)
> +	stw	r24, 64(r1)
> +	stw	r25, 68(r1)
> +	stw	r26, 72(r1)
> +	stw	r27, 76(r1)
> +	stw	r28, 80(r1)
> +	stw	r29, 84(r1)
> +	stw	r30, 88(r1)
> +	stw	r31, 92(r1)
> +#endif
> +#endif

This confuses me. Why are you adding code to the !__powerpc64__ branch
in this commit? (Also, why does stmw not work on LE?)




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux