Hello Jon,
On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 3:58 AM Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 2024-08-23 19:44, Jason Xing wrote:
> > Hello Jon,
> >
> > On Sat, Aug 24, 2024 at 5:19 AM <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> From: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> We add a selftest to check that the new feature added in
> >> commit 05ea491641d3 ("tcp: add support for SO_PEEK_OFF socket option")
> >> works correctly.
> >>
> >> Reviewed-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Tested-by: Stefano Brivio <sbrivio@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >> Signed-off-by: Jon Maloy <jmaloy@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Thanks for working on this. Sorry that I just noticed I missed your
> > previous reply :(
> There is still the ditto UDP selftest to be done ;-)
The reason why I didn't respond at that time is because I was unsure
if I had enough time to finish it. Now it's time.
After digging into this, there will be a lot of duplicated code if I
write a new one named like "udp_so_peek_off". I think adjusting your
tcp_so_peek_off.c to complete the UDP part is just fine. Of course,
tcp_so_peek_off.c will be renamed :)
I will post one later to see if it's reasonable...
Thanks,
Jason
