Hello, thank you for reviewing the patch. > > Cgroup-level CPU statistics currently include time spent on > > user/system processes, but do not include niced CPU time (despite > > already being tracked). This patch exposes niced CPU time to the > > userspace, allowing users to get a better understanding of their > > hardware limits and can facilitate better load-balancing. > > You aren't talking about the in-kernel scheduler's load balancer, right? If > so, can you please update the description? This is a bit too confusing for a > commit message for a kernel commit. Thank you for pointing this out -- I'll edit the commit message to the following in a v2: Cgroup-level CPU statistics currently include time spent on user/system processes, but do not include niced CPU time (despite already being tracked). This patch exposes niced CPU time to the userspace, allowing users to get a better understanding of their hardware limits and can facilitate more informed workload distribution. Thanks, Joshua
