On Tue, Aug 27, 2024 at 11:05:14PM +0800, Xi Ruoyao wrote: > On Tue, 2024-08-27 at 17:00 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote: > > The effect of this patch is to replace include/uapi with usr/include, so > > it will break for you too. > > > > What I'm wondering is why yours and mine work like that, while Ruoyao's > > breaks. He makes a good argument as to why this patch is the "right > > way", even if it breaks our workflow... > > Because arch/loongarch/include/uapi/asm/sigcontext.h includes > <linux/posix_types.h>, but the files for x86 and ppc do not. > > I cannot see how this inclusion is useful anyway, so maybe I can just > remove the inclusion and paper over the real issue for now? The kselftest people might disagree with papering it over and may prefer your patch, but your solution does sound better to me...
