On 8/21/24 11:30 AM, Shuah Khan wrote: > On 8/13/24 04:45, Ilpo Järvinen wrote: >> First, generalize resctrl selftest non-contiguous CAT check to not >> assume non-AMD vendor implies Intel. Second, improve kselftest common >> parts and resctrl selftest such that the use of __cpuid_count() does >> not lead into a build failure (happens at least on ARM). >> >> The last patch might still require some work on which symbol the >> conditional in kselftest.h is implemented. I could not find any >> pre-existing one that could be used. Perhaps somebody who's more >> familiar with the kselftest build system has a better suggestion on >> which symbol the logic should be based at? >> >> Ilpo Järvinen (3): >> selftests/resctrl: Generalize non-contiguous CAT check >> selftests/resctrl: Always initialize ecx to avoid build warnings >> [RFC] kselftest: Provide __cpuid_count() stub on non-x86 archs >> >> tools/testing/selftests/kselftest.h | 6 +++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/lib.mk | 4 ++++ >> tools/testing/selftests/resctrl/cat_test.c | 28 +++++++++++++--------- >> 3 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-) >> > > These changes look good to me. Can you send the RFC patch without the > RFC tag > for me to pull in? I don't apply RFC patches. > > Usama, does this fix the problem you are seeing? Yeah, build errors are resolved. > > Hi Reinette - do these look okay to you? Can you give me an ack if they do? > > thanks, > -- Shuah > -- BR, Muhammad Usama Anjum