[PATCH] selftests/mm: Fix mseal's length

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



We accidentally msealed too much, which could overrun and try to mseal
other regions. This seems to be harmless (at least on top-down
architectures) due to various reasons all aligning, but may very well
cause spurious test failures to e.g bottom-up mmap architectures.

Signed-off-by: Pedro Falcato <pedro.falcato@xxxxxxxxx>
---
 tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
index 0d4d40fb0f88..0c41513219ae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/mm/mseal_test.c
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@ static void test_seal_mprotect_partial_mprotect_tail(bool seal)
        FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
 
        if (seal) {
-               ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, size);
+               ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, page_size);
                FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
        }
 
@@ -1036,7 +1036,7 @@ static void test_seal_munmap_partial_across_vmas(bool seal)
        FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(ptr != (void *)-1);
 
        if (seal) {
-               ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, size);
+               ret = sys_mseal(ptr + page_size, page_size);
                FAIL_TEST_IF_FALSE(!ret);
        }
 
-- 
2.46.0





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux