Re: [PATCH v2 8/9] KVM: selftests: Add a CoCo-specific test for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 8/17/2024 12:53 AM, Pratik R. Sampat wrote:
From: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>

SEV, SEV-ES, and SNP have a few corner cases where there is potential
for KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY to behave differently depending on when it is
issued during initial guest setup. Exercising these various paths
requires a bit more fine-grained control over when the
KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY requests are issued while setting up the guests.

Since these CoCo-specific events are likely to be architecture-specific
KST helpers, take the existing generic test in pre_fault_memory_test.c
as a starting template, and then introduce an x86-specific version of
it with expanded coverage for SEV, SEV-ES, and SNP.

Since there's a reasonable chance that TDX could extend this for similar
testing of TDX, give it a "coco-" prefix rather than an SEV-specific
one.

Signed-off-by: Michael Roth <michael.roth@xxxxxxx>
Co-developed-by: Pratik R. Sampat <pratikrajesh.sampat@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pratik R. Sampat <pratikrajesh.sampat@xxxxxxx>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
  .../kvm/x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c   | 314 ++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 315 insertions(+)
  create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
index 48d32c5aa3eb..65d19b277b06 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile
@@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/amx_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/max_vcpuid_cap_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/triple_fault_event_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/recalc_apic_map_test
+TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += access_tracking_perf_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += demand_paging_test
  TEST_GEN_PROGS_x86_64 += dirty_log_test
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c
new file mode 100644
index 000000000000..e16fe185fb5a
--- /dev/null
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/kvm/x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c
@@ -0,0 +1,314 @@
+// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
+#include <linux/sizes.h>
+
+#include <test_util.h>
+#include <kvm_util.h>
+#include <processor.h>
+#include "sev.h"
+
+/* Arbitrarily chosen values */
+#define TEST_SIZE		(SZ_2M + PAGE_SIZE)
+#define TEST_NPAGES		(TEST_SIZE / PAGE_SIZE)
+#define TEST_SLOT		10
+#define TEST_GPA		0x100000000ul
+#define TEST_GVA		0x100000000ul
+
+enum prefault_snp_test_type {
+	/* Skip pre-faulting tests. */
+	NO_PREFAULT_TYPE = 0,
+	/*
+	 * Issue KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY for GFNs mapping non-private memory
+	 * before finalizing the initial guest contents (e.g. via
+	 * KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH for SNP guests).
+	 *
+	 * This should result in failure since KVM explicitly disallows
+	 * KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY from being issued prior to finalizing the
+	 * initial guest contents.
+	 */
+	PREFAULT_SHARED_BEFORE_FINALIZING = 0,
+	/*
+	 * Issue KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY for GFNs mapping private memory
+	 * before finalizing the initial guest contents (e.g. via
+	 * KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH for SNP guests).
+	 *
+	 * This should result in failure since KVM explicitly disallows
+	 * KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY from being issued prior to finalizing the
+	 * initial guest contents.
+	 */
+	PREFAULT_PRIVATE_BEFORE_FINALIZING,
+	/*
+	 * Issue KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY for GFNs mapping shared/private
+	 * memory after finalizing the initial guest contents
+	 * (e.g. via * KVM_SEV_SNP_LAUNCH_FINISH for SNP guests).
+	 *
+	 * This should succeed since pre-faulting is supported for both
+	 * non-private/private memory once the guest contents are finalized.
+	 */
+	PREFAULT_PRIVATE_SHARED_AFTER_FINALIZING
+};
+
+static void guest_code_sev(void)
+{
+	int i;
+
+	GUEST_ASSERT(rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV) & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ENABLED);
+
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_NPAGES; i++) {
+		uint64_t *src = (uint64_t *)(TEST_GVA + i * PAGE_SIZE);
+		uint64_t val = *src;
+
+		/* Validate the data stored in the pages */
+		if ((i < TEST_NPAGES / 2 && val != i + 1) ||
+		    (i >= TEST_NPAGES / 2 && val != 0)) {
+			GUEST_FAIL("Inconsistent view of memory values in guest");
+		}
+	}
+
+	if (rdmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV) & MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_ENABLED) {
+		wrmsr(MSR_AMD64_SEV_ES_GHCB, GHCB_MSR_TERM_REQ);
+		__asm__ __volatile__("rep; vmmcall");
+		GUEST_FAIL("This should be unreachable.");
+	}
+
+	GUEST_DONE();
+}
+
+static void __pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa, u64 size,
+			       u64 left, bool expect_fail)
+{
+	struct kvm_pre_fault_memory range = {
+		.gpa = gpa,
+		.size = size,
+		.flags = 0,
+	};
+	int ret, save_errno;
+	u64 prev;
+
+	do {
+		prev = range.size;
+		ret = __vcpu_ioctl(vcpu, KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY, &range);
+		save_errno = errno;
+		TEST_ASSERT((range.size < prev) ^ (ret < 0),
+			    "%sexpecting range.size to change on %s",
+			    ret < 0 ? "not " : "",
+			    ret < 0 ? "failure" : "success");
+	} while (ret >= 0 ? range.size : save_errno == EINTR);
+
+	TEST_ASSERT(expect_fail ? !(range.size == left) : (range.size == left),
+		    "[EXPECT %s] completed with %lld bytes left, expected %" PRId64,
+		    expect_fail ? "FAIL" : "PASS",
+		    range.size, left);
+
+	if (left == 0) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(expect_fail ? ret : !ret,
+			    "[EXPECT %s] KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY",
+			    expect_fail ? "FAIL" : "PASS");
+	} else {
+		/*
+		 * For shared memory, no memory slot causes RET_PF_EMULATE. It
+		 * results in -ENOENT.
+		 *
+		 * For private memory, no memory slot is an error case returning
+		 * -EFAULT, but it also possible the only the GPA ranges backed
+		 *  by a slot are marked as private, in which case the noslot
+		 *  range will also result in -ENOENT.
+		 *
+		 *  So allow both errors for now, but in the future it would be
+		 *  good to distinguish between these cases to tighten up the
+		 *  error-checking.
+		 */
+		TEST_ASSERT(expect_fail ? !ret :
+			    (ret && (save_errno == EFAULT || save_errno == ENOENT)),
+			    "[EXPECT %s] KVM_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY",
+			    expect_fail ? "FAIL" : "PASS");
+	}
+}
+
+static void pre_fault_memory(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa,
+			     u64 size, u64 left)
+{
+	__pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, size, left, false);
+}
+
+static void pre_fault_memory_negative(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, u64 gpa,
+				      u64 size, u64 left)
+{
+	__pre_fault_memory(vcpu, gpa, size, left, true);
+}
+
+static void pre_fault_memory_snp(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct kvm_vm *vm,
+				 bool private, enum prefault_snp_test_type p_type)
+{
+	if (p_type == PREFAULT_SHARED_BEFORE_FINALIZING)
+		pre_fault_memory_negative(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+
+	snp_vm_launch_start(vm, SNP_POLICY);
+
+	if (p_type == PREFAULT_SHARED_BEFORE_FINALIZING)
+		pre_fault_memory_negative(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+
+	if (private) {
+		/*
+		 * Make sure when pages are pre-faulted later after
+		 * finalization they are treated the same as a private
+		 * access by the guest so that the expected gmem
+		 * backing pages are used.
+		 */
+		vm_mem_set_private(vm, TEST_GPA, TEST_SIZE);
+		if (p_type == PREFAULT_PRIVATE_BEFORE_FINALIZING)
+			pre_fault_memory_negative(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	} else {
+		if (p_type == PREFAULT_SHARED_BEFORE_FINALIZING)
+			pre_fault_memory_negative(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	}
+
+	snp_vm_launch_update(vm);
+
+	if (p_type == PREFAULT_SHARED_BEFORE_FINALIZING)
+		pre_fault_memory_negative(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+
+	snp_vm_launch_finish(vm);
+
+	/*
+	 * After finalization, pre-faulting either private or shared
+	 * ranges should work regardless of whether the pages were
+	 * encrypted as part of setting up initial guest state.
+	 */
+	if (p_type == PREFAULT_PRIVATE_SHARED_AFTER_FINALIZING) {
+		pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+		pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE);
+		pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
+	}
+}
+
+static void pre_fault_memory_sev(unsigned long vm_type, struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
+				 struct kvm_vm *vm)
+{
+	uint32_t policy = (vm_type == KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM) ? SEV_POLICY_ES : 0;
+
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	sev_vm_launch(vm, policy);
+
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	sev_vm_launch_measure(vm, alloca(256));
+
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
+
+	sev_vm_launch_finish(vm);
+
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA, SZ_2M, 0);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + SZ_2M, PAGE_SIZE * 2, PAGE_SIZE);
+	pre_fault_memory(vcpu, TEST_GPA + TEST_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE, PAGE_SIZE);
+}
+
+static void test_pre_fault_memory_sev(unsigned long vm_type, bool private,
+				      enum prefault_snp_test_type p_type)
+{
+	struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu;
+	struct kvm_vm *vm;
+	struct ucall uc;
+	int i;
+
+	vm = vm_sev_create_with_one_vcpu(vm_type, guest_code_sev, &vcpu);
+
+	vm_userspace_mem_region_add(vm, VM_MEM_SRC_ANONYMOUS,
+				    TEST_GPA, TEST_SLOT, TEST_NPAGES,
+				    (vm_type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM) ? KVM_MEM_GUEST_MEMFD : 0);
+
+	/*
+	 * Make sure guest page table is in agreement with what pages will be
+	 * initially encrypted by the ASP.
+	 */
+	if (private)
+		vm_mem_set_protected(vm, TEST_SLOT, TEST_GPA, TEST_NPAGES);
+
+	virt_map(vm, TEST_GVA, TEST_GPA, TEST_NPAGES);
+
+	/*
+	 * Populate the pages to compare data read from the guest
+	 * Populate the first half with data and second half as all zeros.
+	 */
+	for (i = 0; i < TEST_NPAGES; i++) {
+		uint64_t *hva = addr_gva2hva(vm, TEST_GVA + i * PAGE_SIZE);
+
+		if (i < TEST_NPAGES / 2)
+			*hva = i + 1;
+		else
+			*hva = 0;
+	}
+
+	if (vm_type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM)
+		pre_fault_memory_snp(vcpu, vm, private, p_type);
+	else
+		pre_fault_memory_sev(vm_type, vcpu, vm);
+
+	vcpu_run(vcpu);
+
+	if (vm->type == KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM || vm->type == KVM_X86_SNP_VM) {
+		TEST_ASSERT(vcpu->run->exit_reason == KVM_EXIT_SYSTEM_EVENT,
+			    "Wanted SYSTEM_EVENT, got %s",
+			    exit_reason_str(vcpu->run->exit_reason));
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->system_event.type, KVM_SYSTEM_EVENT_SEV_TERM);
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->system_event.ndata, 1);
+		TEST_ASSERT_EQ(vcpu->run->system_event.data[0], GHCB_MSR_TERM_REQ);
+		goto out;
+	}
+
+	switch (get_ucall(vcpu, &uc)) {
+	case UCALL_DONE:
+		break;
+	case UCALL_ABORT:
+		REPORT_GUEST_ASSERT(uc);
+	default:
+		TEST_FAIL("Unexpected exit: %s",
+			  exit_reason_str(vcpu->run->exit_reason));
+	}
+
+out:
+	kvm_vm_free(vm);
+}
+
+static void test_pre_fault_memory(unsigned long vm_type, bool private)
+{
+	int pt;
+
+	if (vm_type && !(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_VM_TYPES) & BIT(vm_type))) {
+		pr_info("Skipping tests for vm_type 0x%lx\n", vm_type);
+		return;
+	}
+
+	switch (vm_type) {
+	case KVM_X86_SEV_VM:
+	case KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM:
+		test_pre_fault_memory_sev(vm_type, private, NO_PREFAULT_TYPE);
+		break;
+	case KVM_X86_SNP_VM:
+		for (pt = 0; pt <= PREFAULT_PRIVATE_SHARED_AFTER_FINALIZING; pt++)
+			test_pre_fault_memory_sev(vm_type, private, pt);
+		break;
+	default:
+		abort();
+	}
+}
+
+int main(int argc, char *argv[])
+{
+	TEST_REQUIRE(kvm_check_cap(KVM_CAP_PRE_FAULT_MEMORY));
+
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SEV_VM, false);
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SEV_VM, true);
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, false);
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SEV_ES_VM, true);
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SNP_VM, false);
+	test_pre_fault_memory(KVM_X86_SNP_VM, true);
+
+	return 0;
+}

Hello Pratik,
I see below failure while running this test [kvm-x86/next + mentioned patches]:

# selftests: kvm: coco_pre_fault_memory_test
# Random seed: 0x6b8b4567
# ==== Test Assertion Failure ====
# x86_64/coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:145: expect_fail ? !(range.size == left) : (range.size == left)
#   pid=202665 tid=202665 errno=9 - Bad file descriptor
# 1 0x0000000000402870: __pre_fault_memory at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:145 # 2 0x00000000004031c9: pre_fault_memory_negative at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:184 # 3 (inlined by) pre_fault_memory_snp at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:202 # 4 (inlined by) test_pre_fault_memory_sev at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:344 # 5 0x00000000004033c0: test_pre_fault_memory at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:401 (discriminator 3) # 6 0x00000000004024d7: main at coco_pre_fault_memory_test.c:417 (discriminator 2)
#      7        0x00007f9474829d8f: ?? ??:0
#      8        0x00007f9474829e3f: ?? ??:0
#      9        0x0000000000402574: _start at ??:?
#   [EXPECT FAIL] completed with 0 bytes left, expected 0
not ok 66 selftests: kvm: coco_pre_fault_memory_test # exit=254







[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux