Re: [PATCH v9 00/13] riscv: Add support for xtheadvector

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Tue, Aug 13, 2024 at 04:55:27PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2024 at 05:45:30PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 09, 2024 at 11:31:15PM +0100, Conor Dooley wrote:
> > > On Tue, Aug 06, 2024 at 05:31:36PM -0700, Charlie Jenkins wrote:
> > > > xtheadvector is a custom extension that is based upon riscv vector
> > > > version 0.7.1 [1]. All of the vector routines have been modified to
> > > > support this alternative vector version based upon whether xtheadvector
> > > > was determined to be supported at boot.
> > > > 
> > > > vlenb is not supported on the existing xtheadvector hardware, so a
> > > > devicetree property thead,vlenb is added to provide the vlenb to Linux.
> > > > 
> > > > There is a new hwprobe key RISCV_HWPROBE_KEY_VENDOR_EXT_THEAD_0 that is
> > > > used to request which thead vendor extensions are supported on the
> > > > current platform. This allows future vendors to allocate hwprobe keys
> > > > for their vendor.
> > > > 
> > > > Support for xtheadvector is also added to the vector kselftests.
> > > 
> > > So uh, since noone seems to have brought it up, in the light of the issues
> > > with thead's vector implementation, (https://ghostwriteattack.com/) do we
> > > want to enable it at all?
> > 
> > I can make it clear in the kconfig that xtheadvector is succeptible to
> > this attack and that it should be enabled with caution. I think we
> > should let people that understand the risk to enable it.
> 
> I think the clearest way might be "depends on BROKEN"?

Sorry for the delay, I am not sure if BROKEN is the best way of doing
this. There is the generic CPU_MITIGATIONS config that I think we should
use to handle this at boot time. This would allow generic kernels to be
used on the platform, but a kernel config of "mitigations=off" would
allow xtheadvector to be enabled. I'll look into this a bit more and
send out a patch. Palmer merged a patch into for-next to enable
GENERIC_CPU_VULNERABILITIES for riscv so I will add ghostwrite there
as well.

- Charlie





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Wireless]     [Linux Kernel]     [ATH6KL]     [Linux Bluetooth]     [Linux Netdev]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Share Photos]     [IDE]     [Security]     [Git]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Linux ATA RAID]     [Samba]     [Device Mapper]

  Powered by Linux