When checking MTE tags, we print some diagnostic messages when the tests
fail. Some variables uses there are "longs", however we only use "%x"
for the format specifier.
Update the format specifiers to "%lx", to match the variable types they
are supposed to print.
Fixes: f3b2a26ca78d ("kselftest/arm64: Verify mte tag inclusion via prctl")
Signed-off-by: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@xxxxxxx>
---
tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
index 2b1425b92b699..a3d1e23fe02af 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/arm64/mte/check_tags_inclusion.c
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@ static int check_single_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check tag value */
if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) == tag) {
- ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n",
+ ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%x\n",
MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr),
MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAG(tag));
result = KSFT_FAIL;
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@ static int check_multiple_included_tags(int mem_type, int mode)
ptr = mte_insert_tags(ptr, BUFFER_SIZE);
/* Check tag value */
if (MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr) < tag) {
- ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%x with include mask=0x%x\n",
+ ksft_print_msg("FAIL: wrong tag = 0x%lx with include mask=0x%lx\n",
MT_FETCH_TAG((uintptr_t)ptr),
MT_INCLUDE_VALID_TAGS(excl_mask));
result = KSFT_FAIL;
--
2.25.1
